People in East Harlem know theres a new train coming – eventually.
They know about the train stops planned on Second Avenue at 106th and 116th streets, with another at 125th Street and Lexington.
But what many residents are just starting to realize is that preliminary MTA plans to build those new Second Avenue stations require taking over dozens of properties and displacing hundreds of people along the Q trains future path.
The exact number of properties and displacements is up in the air, as is the future of the project. When asked when construction may begin, the MTA points out the project still needs billions in funding to start in earnest. And the Trump administration has included zero dollars for the project in this years budget.
Despite that uncertainty, the MTA has begun preparing for possible construction — while keeping many of the people who could be directly affected by it in the dark about what, if anything, they can plan on.
There are as many as 41 properties that may be seized by eminent domain to make way for the second phase of the Second Avenue subway, according to plans in the MTAs latest environmental assessment of the project.
On the 23rd page of the sixth section of the 230-page document (which got federal approval in November), the MTAs plan is laid out in black and white: The subway construction is slated to permanently displace 505 workers and 140 residential tenants.
That far eclipses the seven property seizures and 56 residential tenants displaced in the first phase of the Second Avenue Subway on the Upper East Side — and triples what the MTA estimated in a preliminary plan for the East Harlem portion of the train project in 2004.
The properties slated to be partially or fully taken by the MTA are diverse, from large development lots on East 125th Street to hair salons, bodegas and small apartment buildings farther south.
Lived Here All Our Life
Among them is 2128 Second Ave., a four-story brick building owned by Carlos Hernandez Jr., a longtime East Harlem resident who inherited the property from his father, who bought the place in 1981, deeds show.
Hernandez, 60, said the thought of selling the building is emotional for him because his family “lived here all our life.”
But Hernandez is in treatment for cancer of the thyroid and lymph nodes, and cashing out and leaving is precisely what hes trying to do. If it were up to him, he told THE CITY after a recent surgery, hed have sold already and moved to North Carolina to be closer to his 83-year-old mother.
Yet because of the MTAs plans, Hernandez is stuck. He doesnt know if or when the agency would buy him out, and hes having a hard time finding a buyer because investors interested in the building get spooked “once they find out about the MTA.”
“For me, personally, its affected me big time,” he said. “Physically and mentally, its bothering me.”
Getting more specifics from transit officials has been tough, he said. One MTA representative told his real estate broker a final design with a concrete list of property condemnations was “imminent” — while another said in an email that the MTA couldnt project “with any degree of certainty, if we will need to acquire your clients property at this time.”
Should They Stay or Go?
Next door, Julian Hoyos is trying to plan for the future, too. His familys restaurant, Cascalote Latin Bistro, has been open for five years after he, his wife and their three daughters used most of their savings — more than $200,000, he said — to gut renovate the ground-floor space. Now, the Hoyos are staring at a lease thats up in two years. Should they stay and roll the dice with the MTA, or leave now?
“I dont want to go out of business with nothing,” he said, prepping ingredients in the restaurants tidy kitchen.
He has heard commercial tenants are entitled to compensation. He is correct – federal eminent domain rules requires the state to reimburse losses caused by moving the business, among other things. But he hasnt heard any details from the MTA.
“They havent said anything,” he said.
In fact, the only reason the Hoyos knew theyre on the map of potential property seizures is because a friend heard about it at a community board meeting.
“I was pissed off,” said Julians 28-year-old daughter, Nereyda. “I was like, What? What do you mean? I thought we werent going to be affected at all because the station was going to be on 106th.”
Officially, the MTA says any relocations are “years away” and could be fewer than whats listed in the environmental assessment documents, according to Janno Lieber, the authoritys head of Capital Construction.
In a statement to THE CITY, Lieber emphasized the benefit to the neighborhood that the new train would bring.
“This project is hugely important to the East Harlem community — the most transit-dependent neighborhood in NYC — and the residents deserve better access to jobs, education and healthcare,” he said.
Lieber contended the authority is “working extremely closely with all communities along the new route,” including communicating about the project through a storefront community information center on East 125th Street, hosting public meetings and a dozen popup “community conversations.”
Communication Gap Cited
The MTA has alerted property owners about the possibility it would take their properties in letters sent as early as May of last year, according to two such letters obtained by THE CITY. But many residents, particularly rental tenants, have heard nothing.
When told about the MTAs plans by THE CITY, several business owners, workers and residents who work and live in the buildings targeted by the subway plans said they had never heard of the possibility that they were on the chopping block.
Cheikh Diop, 63, had not known of the plan before seeing the MTA document where his luggage and clothing shop, Touba African Store, is outlined in yellow on a map and labeled “Ancillary 1.” Its one of four properties just north of East 115th Street slated to become a ventilation facility.
“I have nowhere to go to turn,” he said.Read More – Source