SHARE

While it seems to be a primal, immediate outpouring, Edvard Munchs The Scream (1893) actually emerged slowly from the depths of his soul. On The Art Newspaper podcast, Giulia Bartram, the curator of the exhibition Edvard Munch: Love and Angst at the British Museum, tells us about the works links to a large body of work featuring figures engulfed by nature.

“Much of Munchs work is about evoking a mood,” Bartram says. “And you will notice that even when the figures turned towards you, often their faces are obscured slightly. Unless hes doing a straight portrait, hes really tuned into that use of symbolism. Symbolism in art was really redolent at the time, so people were used to reading something else, something other into the work. But the important effect of the ones where figures are turning away—and this does happen a lot, he has one lot of contemplative figures on shorelines, the young woman on the beach, just a single figure looking at sea—they have a dual-edged meaning to them. They draw in the spectator, because theyre trying to work out whats going on, but then you find that the spectator can also impose what theyre thinking, as if they are in that position of looking away, in contemplation out to sea.”

Of course, The Scream features a figure facing the viewer, but that work, too, has its origins in another painting that features Munch himself with his back to us. “The genesis of the Scream goes back to a very specific episode which he recalls, in fact, when he is in Nice in the South of France, on holiday with an artist friend of his, the Norwegian Christian Skredsvig,” Bartram explains. “He recounts to him an episode which had happened a few months before, which had taken place when he is out for a walk on the road above the Oslo fjord. He wasnt feeling well. He said: I was feeling sick. But he looked up and the most incredible blood-red skies appeared; the sunset was particularly vivid, and he said it was red, red as blood, coagulated like blood.”

Edvard Munch, The Scream (1895) is in the show at the British Museum
Photo: Thomas Widerberg

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

Munch was clearly obsessed with what he saw and its effect on his mood, as his companion remembered. “Skredsvig, on his part, when he recalls this in his memoirs, really got rather sick of Munch recounting this episode,” Bartram says. He urged Munch to paint what he saw and get it off his chest. The first result was called Despair, for which he made a sketch that appears in the British Museum show, and eventually turned into a painting. “[It] shows Munch with the two friends that hes walking along the road with, and theyre sauntering way further ahead, completely unconcerned. Munch himself, in this case, is represented as a figure in a coat and a bowler hat, turned looking away down the fjord, as if the despair has made him momentarily pause and take breath.

“This then translates within a year or so into The Scream itself, in which the memorable waving skies and the red and blue clouds are caught up in the whole composition, as though the whole thing is resonating like a tuning fork, and as though the moment of anxiety that he felt well-up in him at this episode is affecting his whole body.”

Edvard Munch's Despair (1892)

The version of The Scream in the British Museum show is arguably even more graphic and powerful than the painting itself. “He interprets it again in a lithograph a year or so later when he starts using the technique, in which the red and blue bands are translated into just black wavy bands which again swirl through the whole composition. And he inscribes it here, with an inscription in German, as he was now in Berlin, which I translate here. Underneath [the image], he says: I Read More – Source

[contf]
[contfnew]

the art news paper

[contfnewc]
[contfnewc]