SHARE

If California is serious about fixing its housing challenges, it should wean its cities off the sales tax gravy train.

Until local municipalities are properly motivated to build, not much will change. And the only persuasion that makes cities jump is cash.

Currently, cities are addicted to boosting sales tax collection because its about the only cash flow that can be enhanced with development powers. So, your city council often acts more like a mall developer than a civic group building a healthy community.

Debating how much more housing California needs wont cure a thing. Suing growth-resistant cities only makes lawyers happy. Pontificating about “free market” solutions is for academia. And tweaking environmental rules to promote housing construction is a wasted effort when local planning agencies are essentially paid to build more retail space.

Cures to the housing shortage demand bold thinking. And getting cities from wasting time — and real estate — on retailing is a grand first step.

Yes, shopping is part of a towns fabric of life. And yes, it should be nurtured. Still, a citys ability to reap sales taxes from whats sold within city limits distorts local planning efforts.

If cities were paid via a significant slice of state income tax collected on their residents — not local spending — housing would surely regain planning prominence. We are talking serious money to spread around: California collects roughly $100 billion in income taxes annually, double what comes in from various sales taxes.

Overnight, city leaders wont worry where its citizens shop and dine. Rather, theyll focus on growing populations.

You see, in todays crazy California budgeting world, the local merchant is king. Sales tax revenues fund roughly one-third of the typical citys budget. And note, the states general fund keeps roughly half of all sales tax collected.

This unusual game can be blamed on Prop. 13 and its dramatic limits on property taxes. To be fair, the sales-tax focus may have worked, historically speaking. But into todays age of booming online shopping, making money off local retail is a badly challenged concept.

Sadly, cities continue to double down on their sales-tax bet. Why? Its the largest cash-generating lever they have! Worse, retail battles among California cities produce little collective good — unless youre a merchant or store owner. This charade of urban planning only moves the spending from one city to another.

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

This municipal thirst for sales tax revenue drives the odd city passions for auto malls. That same addiction means cities must choose to constantly approve the refurbishing of aging local shopping centers. Instead, landowners should be lobbied to turn stores into housing.

These same monetary urges also create less-than-subtle city nudges to homebuilders — if not stiff zoning rules — to incorporate new retail options into their construction plans. You know, those “mixed-use” centers blending homes with stores, hotels and/or office space. That makes the limited housing built even more expensive!

Forget the legalese and legislative hoops that would be required by my idea to detox cities off sales tax. Dont hyperventilate over what formula could make such a transition palatable.

Lets assume my plan would be done in such a way that the total tax bill for most Californians would not change. And lets not bother analyzing what cities would win — and which ones would lose — if such a dramatic switch occurred.

Just simply focus on a day when cities are truly financially motivated to attract workers to live in their cities.

Today, common municipal thinking is that extra residents in new housing are largely a financial cost to the city. You know, absorbing the expense of protecting and serving these new citizens. Its another reason home construction projects are often derided in government chambers.

Ponder the opportunity for a massive municipal rethinking that would take place if cities got much more of their funding based on what their residents earned vs. what they spent locally.

Sign up for The Home Stretch newsletter. Get weekly housing news on affordability, renting, buying, selling and more. Subscribe here.

In my brave new world, mayors and councilmen would no longer be luring mall developers, car dealers, and big-box retailers. Rather, citizens would become Read More – Source

[contf] [contfnew]

daily news

[contfnewc] [contfnewc]