By Hannah Wiley and Sophia Bollag
The Sacramento Bee

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Saturday declined to pick a fight with the Trump administration, announcing hed veto a bill that would have preserved Obama-era environmental policies and negated the Republicans regulations.

Newsom announced his opposition to Senate Bill 1 several hours after California lawmakers approved it early Saturday morning, closing a week in which the Trump administration rolled back a 2015 water pollution regulation that aimed to protect wetlands.

“I fully support the principles behind Senate Bill 1: to defeat efforts by the president and Congress to undermine vital federal protections that protect clean air, clean water and endangered species,” Newsom said in a written statement. “Senate Bill 1 does not, however, provide the state with any new authority to push back against the Trump administrations environmental policies and it limits the states ability to rely upon the best available science to protect our environment.”

The changes would have restored many environmental and workplace safety regulations created by former President Barack Obama that President Donald Trump has weakened or repealed. It was targeted squarely had Trump, and had a clause that would cause it to expire the day he leaves office in 2025 if he wins a second term.

Newsom has been a vocal critic of the presidents environmental policies and has joined Attorney General Xavier Becerra in promoting many of the lawsuits the state has filed against Trump administration climate policies.

Since Trumps inauguration, the state has filed more than two dozen climate lawsuits, according to Becerras office. The suits include efforts to preserve fossil-burning power plant restrictions, enforce fuel efficiency standards and defend the Clean Water Act.

SB 1 was a legislative attempt to preserve some of the same policies.

Your ads will be inserted here by

Easy Plugin for AdSense.

Please go to the plugin admin page to
Paste your ad code OR
Suppress this ad slot.

“I acknowledge that this is a big and important measure,” said bill author and Senate President Pro Tem Toni Atkins, D-San Diego. “I think we are living in times that demand our urgent action to protect our states natural resources, our environment and worker safety.”

But ultimately the bill went too far for some top California Democrats, notably Newsom and U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

Powerful farm and water groups said the bill would threaten water-sharing agreements negotiated with Newsoms team. Feinstein and California representatives signed a letter last week calling for Central Valley-friendly edits.

Atkins then relaxed some of the bills provisions to allow state agencies additional discretion over re-adopting the older regulations, but the bill still faced opposition ahead of its early Saturday morning vote.

The California Chamber of Commerce joined nearly 100 organizations in opposing the bill. The chamber said SB 1s provisions “unnecessarily threaten water supply reliability for millions of Californians and threaten to exacerbate Californias housing crisis and disrupt agricultural operations throughout California,” according to the bill analysis.

During Saturday floor debates, both Republicans and Democrats in the Assembly and Senate spoke against the bill, with a handful of Central Valley lawmakers protesting provisions they said would hurt their immigrant and agricultural communities. Others accused Democrats of a thinly veiled attack against the president.

“This bill is being jammed upon us for some political statement. This is not responsible. This is not how water policy should be made in our state,” said Assemblyman Vince Fong, R-Bakersfield. “If this bill continues youre jeopardizing the water stability for the entire state and the economic health and well being of all of us.”

Supporters said the Environmental Protection Agency under Trump has watered down protections that will protect future generations and Californias wildlife, and thus endanger the states natural resources and endangered species.

“The very reason this leRead More – Source